fbpx

October 2018 Performance

Global equities had the worst monthly fall since May 2012 when the euro sovereign debt crisis and Grexit loomed large. The sell-off was sparked by rising bond rates, some disappointing earnings results in the US (more on outlook than numbers) and weaker global economic data. Sentiment worsened in October due to a cocktail of worries over strong USD, further China slow-down, concerns over the Fed’s tightening pace, and the continuation of the U.S.-China trade frictions.

Our asset allocation portfolios have been considerably overweight cash, which has reduced, but not eliminated the downside.

 

The weakness has rolled on into November with further falls as markets re-test February lows – seemingly with little in the way of a circuit breaker. Our direct portfolios have been generally outperforming the falling market, although with quite wild swings from day to day in markets the amount has varied. Our tactical portfolios have been considerably steadier. We have been carrying large cash balances for some time in our portfolios with a view that it is late in the cycle – and holding this cash has limited the downside. There are two main questions that investors have been asking:

  1. Is this the start of the major downturn Nucleus have been waiting for?
  2. If not, is this a buying opportunity? 

The short answers are “no” and “a little bit” respectively. Our core view remains that US earnings and the US economy remain strong enough for the cycle to continue – absent a major shock. This does seem to be a garden variety downturn as a stock market that has rallied hard over a number of years pulls back. Actual company earnings have been exceptional in the US, forward earnings expectations have been downgraded, but are still relatively strong. Elsewhere in the world company earnings look weak.

Were this early in the economic cycle we would be looking to use this pullback to significantly increase our weights to shares. As it is late in the cycle, we have been increasing our weights to equities at the margin to take advantage of lower prices, but maintaining a significant cash and bond holdings. We have significantly increased our bond weights with the view that credit conditions in Australia are worsening and are not reflected in the market outlook.   

Distilling the Key October Fears 

We view this downturn as a product of the uncertainty in many areas rather than a tangible risk in any particular area. The key issues raising uncertainty remain: 

  • Corporate earnings: A fairly small number of high-profile companies guided expectations lower, raising the uncertainty associated with equity
  • Trade: Chinese trade negotiations have stalled, and the tariffs are affecting Chinese economic growth and some Global corporate results.
  • Slowing economy: Despite strong data in the month the US economy is slowing slightly, and the market is worried that trend will continue in 2019.
  • Rate increases: Investors are uncertain if the Federal Reserve will keep raising rates in a slowing economy, potentially leading to a recession.

Many market economists compare today to 1937 where, following the Great Depression, the US central bank raised rates too quickly and the economy fell back into recession. The concern remains the US central bank will make the same mistake.

Earnings stumble not tumble

Actual 3rd quarter US earnings season were exceptionally strong, growing at over 20% and mainly beating expectations. Clearly, earnings will slow into 2019 as most of the growth was related to lower tax rates. There were some early signs this quarter may have seen the peak earnings growth for the cycle. Analysts are expecting 10% growth for 2019 and 2020, which might be a little high but with the benefit of share buybacks, some tax effects, and a relatively strong US economy, earnings growth forecasts for 2019 have relatively limited downside in our view. 

Trade War Smoulders

While there was a more conciliatory tone between China and the US in October, we are not expecting any imminent resolution. Absent a sudden change in view from Trump (which is possible but we feel unlikely), comments from key Trump advisors suggest the trade war will continue for the foreseeable future. 

Economic Data not so bad

US Q3 GDP of 3.5% q/q  beat estimates driven by strong consumer spending which was the best since late 2014. In Europe the rise in headline inflation from 2.1% in September to 2.2% in October was in line with the consensus forecast and the core the core rate is still low at 1.1%. The German Ifo index (indicating business confidence) still suggests growth, but it is slowing but consistent with healthy annual German GDP growth of over 2%. China did post its slowest quarterly GDP growth since 2009 at 6.5% but this was largely expected. However, looking through a bearish prism many of the data points were interpreted as indicating that global growth has moderated.

Bonds the catalyst

In the US Bond market, October saw a return of volatility with ‘risk-off’ the dominant sentiment. The strong US economic data led to a rise in US Treasury yields as the market contemplated more interest rate hikes from the US Federal Reserve. The sustained breach of the 3% yield level by the 10-year US Treasuries was one of the key catalysts in the October Risk sell-off. Ultimately the 10-year US Treasury yield increased to a high of 3.23%, which is its highest level since 2011, but the resultant volatility across all asset classes saw government bonds benefit, and US Treasury yields falling back to 3.15% by month end. In Europe, bond markets came under pressure early over concerns about the Italian Government’s proposed spending plans and resultant budget deficit but were placated by Italy but retaining its BBB rating. 

Additionally, for the past 8-10 years, central banks have been pouring money into asset markets. The unwinding of the US central bank balance sheet, plus a tapering in Europe and Japan, along with weaker global economic data proved the tipping point for risk assets.

 

Figure X:  US 10 Year Treasury Rate

Source: Macrotrends 

The ASX dutifully followed suit

Locally, Australian stocks were caught in the October downdraft. The ASX 50 fell 6.4% (total return), the largest monthly drawdown in over three years. The past two months has seen the ASX 200 give back calendar year-to-date gains to be tracking -0.5% for 2018 calendar year. Banks (-1.3%) and Resources (-1.4%) were the main culprits in dragging our market lower – unsurprisingly the high Beta Technology sector was the worst-performing sector. Once again large caps were preferred over small and mid-cap counterparts. Post the correction Healthcare has seen the largest PE de-rate, from 32x to 26x (since Aug-18 peak). While the the broader market is now trading in line with the long-term average of 14.5x, it remains well above world levels. 

Issue 1: US Economic Growth

The US economy is not without blemishes, in particular, the housing market is showing signs of slowing. However, much to the dismay of those who feel that economic growth should reflect the moral fortitude of the sitting US President, economic growth elsewhere has been strong, wage growth picking up and inflation contained.

While there are valid question marks about the long-term sustainability of government deficit spending, this is not a near-term economic issue.  

Rising rates might affect US growth, but in our view, it is far too early to draw that conclusion from the limited increase in rates and their low levels.

Issue 2: Chinese Economic Growth

The key indicator is growth in credit, and credit continues to slow.

In response, there has been a significant lift in infrastructure approvals:

Our view is that the Chinese economy will slow quite markedly on the manufacturing and industrial side, which will be offset by increasing spending on debt and infrastructure. It is likely that the Chinese economy will slow further before the government stimulus kicks in, and that may not be enough to halt the slowdown completely but neither will growth fall off a cliff.  

We are mildly positive the bulk commodities (iron ore and coal) given the infrastructure and property spend that is likely, but less positive industrial metals which will be hit more by slowing demand. 

 

Tactical Asset Allocation Portfolio Positioning 

In our tactical portfolios, we own cash, bonds, international shares and Australian shares. We tend to blend these portfolios for clients so that each investor receives an exposure tailored to their own risk and income requirements.

The broad sweep of our asset allocation over the last 18 months was to ride the Trump Boom, switch into Europe in March / April last year as the US became overvalued and then switch back into the US as the Euro rallied and the USD fell. 

We remain underweight shares in aggregate, marginally overweight international shares and significantly underweight Australian shares. We have added considerably to our bond holdings in recent weeks.

Over / Underweight positions by portfolio

Source: Nucleus Wealth

Tactical Foundation Portfolio

Our tactical foundation portfolio is designed for investors with lower balances, it uses exchange-traded funds for its international exposure rather than direct shares. The reason for this is parcel sizes,  you can’t buy half a Google (Alphabet) share directly and so we use exchange-traded funds which buy baskets of stocks instead. The tactical foundation portfolio is a balanced fund, not as aggressive in its holdings as the growth fund nor as conservative as our income fund.

As with other portfolios, we increased our bond weights considerably.

 

Performance to date

Portfolio performance can be cut a number of different ways. At its most basic level, you should care about the total return. At the next level, you should care about the total return relative to some sort of benchmark.

As you dig deeper, you should also be interested how the return was achieved – for example if your fund manager is taking lots of risk but only performing slightly better than the market then you should be concerned. Similarly, if you can get market returns but at a much lower risk then that may be an appropriate trade-off.

Our portfolios to date have been taking less risk and in most cases out-performing benchmarks. The disclaimer is that they have only been running for 15 months, and that is not enough time to make definitive judgements.

We manage our portfolios for investors through separately managed accounts, which have a host of benefits including transparency,  individual tax treatment, direct ownership, customisations (including ethical overlays) and low trade costs. 

However, because separately managed accounts are either subtly different (due to slightly different stock weights) or explicitly different (due to ethical screening) for every customer, there is not one performance figure that we can quote. 

The table at the top shows performance for a client paying the maximum administration fee. We have not added in any benefit for franking credits or for withholding tax credits.  

Epilogue

In summary, our view continues to be that Australian investors should continue to hold minimum weights for Australian shares at this point in the cycle. Our intention is that our portfolio is positioned to take advantage of our key themes but minimise risk in the event that our themes take longer than expected to resolve themselves.

We retain relatively large cash and bond balances to hedge against volatility and to look for a cheaper entry point. If markets continue to be weak then we will look to buy more international equities. We are concerned about the potential for trade wars or an emerging markets crisis. These will be a key focus for us over the next few months.

Recent months have been a reminder for investors about the benefit of positioning and of taking profits when markets rise. Markets are still clearly not without risk. We spent July and August winding back equity positions, but have been using recent market weakness to begin building positions again in the “risky” half of the portfolio while in the “defensive” half of our portfolio we have been adding more to our bond holdings to (1) add more protection to our portfolio and (2) take advantage of what we feel is a major mispricing of Australian interest rate risks.

Over the longer term we have concerns for equity markets, but the recent market pullback is premature (for international stocks) and there are still a range of economic outcomes which could see international markets continue to grind higher.

 

 

Damien Klassen is Head of Investments at Nucleus Wealth.

The information on this blog contains general information and does not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. Past performance is not an indication of future performance. Damien Klassen is an authorised representative of Nucleus Wealth Management, a Corporate Authorised Representative of Integrity Private Wealth Pty Ltd, AFSL 436298.

Share on Facebook0Share on Google+0Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn0