Stock markets are oscillating between hope and resignation. The hopeful side has two different, quite distinct strains. The bearish arguments are more about the degree of pessimism. But first, some background.
Global markets (excluding banks and resources) are on a forward earnings multiple of around 18.5x. i.e. stocks are, on average, 18.5x higher than the earnings which back them.
This is higher in the US and Australia and lower in Europe and Japan. Vs history, it is at the 80th percentile (i.e. expensive):
Earnings have fallen about 10% so far. Typical indicators suggest there is a lot more downside. But analyst forecasts are holding up. In the last month or so, forecasts have been resilient. Optimists are suggesting that earnings forecasts have bottomed.
Bullish argument 1: Bad news is good news
A return to 2021 conditions. Bad economic data means that bond yields will fall, central banks will reverse course, flood the market with liquidity and earnings multiples will expand.
This argument is basically:
- Earnings forecasts won’t fall much further
- Falling yields will mean that the amount investors pay for assets will increase.
Say earnings fall by less than 5%, and markets return to post-pandemic multiple highs of 22.5x. This would imply 10-15% upside to stock markets from here.
In my view, this is not rational. High earnings multiples come from excitement about earnings growth, not relief about the lack of downside. Markets can be irrational. But investing because you expect markets to become less rational is rarely a winning strategy.
The days where bond yields fall and the tech sector rises are the days where this narrative is the winning one.
Bullish argument 2: a soft landing
This argument is that the Fed has done a masterful job, and inflation will ease back into range while employment edges lower.
This argument is basically:
- Earnings forecasts have bottomed and will start to rise, outpacing inflation
- The multiple paid might ease lower, but higher earnings will mask any weakness.
Say earnings rise by 10%, and markets trade roughly on current multiples. Including dividends and buybacks, there could again be 10-15% upside to stock markets from here.
I’m not going to say that a soft landing can’t happen. It is just that soft landings are extremely rare. And even the rare ones usually rely on an external factor to rescue the economic cycle. A deus ex-machina.
If a gift from the gods is what you expect, then this scenario makes sense. In the face of gas shortages, the incredibly warm winter in Europe counts as one gift. This scenario could make sense if more of these events are coming.
But investing on the hope that something will turn up is not my favoured strategy. To put it mildly.
Bearish argument 1: central banks will do what they say they are going to
Don’t fight the Fed is an investment mantra. It indicates that when the US central bank (the Fed) is raising rates, it is bad for markets and vice versa. The Fed is raising rates. The chair is indicating that interest rates will be higher for longer to cure inflation. If that means a recession, he says that price will be paid.
Market pricing at the moment is that markets do not believe central banks. They are pricing that the economy will go into recession by the second half of the year, and central banks will quickly reverse course.
This leaves us with a simple bearish argument. What if the Fed does what it says it will do?
Typical recessions see earnings down around 20%. Earnings multiples bottom at about 12 or 13x. That implies a 50% downside from here. Welp. Even a mildish recession suggests 30% downside to equity prices.
Is this likely? Probably not. Is it possible? Sure.
So, not a base case but a risk case.
Bearish argument 2: central banks cause a recession and then reverse
Bond markets are already pricing this as the most likely outcome. We concur but note the high level of uncertainty.
The big issue here is the level of earnings downgrades. If earnings downgrades are limited to 5-10%, then prices are less likely to fall dramatically. If investors can “see the other side” of the economic recession, then maybe earnings multiples can stay at elevated levels. i.e. investors will acknowledge the negative earnings but look forward to the growth that follows every downturn. Meaning only 5-10% downside for markets.
But, it is a slippery slope. The further earnings fall, and the less responsive central banks are, the further away the recovery is. So stock markets will fall quickly as both earnings and pricing multiples are downgraded.
Over the past 20 years, developed market economies have become financialised. Both housing and stock markets make up an ever greater proportion of consumer wealth. Increasing values means consumers spend more. But it can also go in reverse. Arguably, central banks have become bubble managers, responsible for injecting confidence into markets.
With the feedback loop between asset markets and consumer spending, it becomes reflexive: rising confidence increases asset prices which therefore increases consumer spending, justifying the prior rise in asset prices. The key central bank responsibility? Making sure the system doesn’t go into reverse.
There is an elevated level of uncertainty at the moment. Investors, economists, central banks, consumers, and corporates are all struggling to come to terms with how to interpret the economy:
- Central banks are trying to guide to higher rates for longer. Markets have been, to a certain extent, ignoring what central banks are saying. The US central bank releases a “dot plot” showing that they expect rates to be over 5% by the end of 2023. In contrast, markets are pricing in rate cuts in the second half of the year.
- Economists are mostly expecting a recession for developed markets. Strategists are calling for earnings to fall 10% or more. Individual stock analysts are largely ignoring both. They are still expecting positive earnings growth from companies.
- The US central bank GDP forecast confidence interval ranges between a recessionary -1% and a booming 3%+ growth.
- Forward indicators from business surveys are at recessionary levels, suggesting a tough ride ahead. In contrast, companies are still hiring. Unemployment rates are at generational lows in a number of countries.
It is no wonder that markets are confused, oscillating between fear and elation.
The bearish arguments make more sense to us. However, uncertainty is high. A slippery slope of feedback loops could quickly turn a mild bearish argument into a devastatingly bad one. Equally, a string of better-than-expected outcomes could turn a mild bearish view into a bullish one.
It is prudent to stay invested for the most likely outcome but be prepared to change.
Australia is expensive:
In our view, most of this is pricing a roaring Chinese recovery. This has yet to occur. The expected wave of stimulus and property development has yet to happen.
It may still occur.
But markets are already pricing a healthy property market recovery. If the current situation continues, the Australian stock market is significantly more at risk than other markets.